http://washingtonbriefs.com Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:16:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://washingtonbriefs.com/2011/04/07/did-fate-conspire-to-allow-kagan-to-duck-health-care-issue/#comment-505 Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:16:06 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=613#comment-505 Did/does Kagan oppose the new legislation? Would it really have mattered if her position was known before her nomination?

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2011/02/03/judiciary-committee-nominees-votes/#comment-492 Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:32:54 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=587#comment-492 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by cbsandrew and Michelle Olsen, Lawrence Hurley. Lawrence Hurley said: Senate Judiciary Committee back in judicial nomination action: http://bit.ly/hkplPW [...]

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/12/19/more-judicial-confirmations/#comment-477 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:36:53 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=555#comment-477 [...] Briefs Skip to content HomeAboutContact ← Updated: More Judicial Confirmations December 23, 2010 · 11:00 am ↓ Jump to [...]

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/11/12/veteran-with-case-before-supreme-court-has-died/#comment-219 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:42:40 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=527#comment-219 [...] Washington Briefs notes the death of David Henderson, the petitioner in Henderson v. Shinseki.  The case, which is currently scheduled for oral argument on December 6, involves the question of whether the limitations period for veterans seeking judicial review of denied claims for disability benefits can sometimes be extended in the interest of fairness. Henderson’s attorney has filed a motion asking to substitute the late man’s widow as a party, on the ground that she would be entitled to whatever benefits Henderson had accrued. [...]

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/11/12/veteran-with-case-before-supreme-court-has-died/#comment-218 Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:03:12 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=527#comment-218 [...] Washington Briefs notes the death of David Henderson, the petitioner in Henderson v. Shinseki.  The case, which is currently scheduled for oral argument on December 6, involves the question of whether the limitations period for veterans seeking judicial review of denied claims for disability benefits can sometimes be extended in the interest of fairness. Henderson’s attorney has filed a motion asking to substitute the late man’s widow as a party, on the ground that she would be entitled to whatever benefits Henderson had accrued. Share This [...]

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/10/19/note-to-readers/#comment-215 Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:35:44 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=518#comment-215 Good luck with the new job!

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/10/04/denied-this-is-how-many-paid-petitions-were-denied-today/#comment-207 Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:05:58 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=509#comment-207 It only took one day to go through all those petitions?

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/09/27/justice-kagans-recusals/#comment-205 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:38:59 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=498#comment-205 Looks like a busy line up for her.

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/08/11/acting-solicitor-general-bedding-in/#comment-202 Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:38:11 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=493#comment-202 Interesting phrase, “bedding in.” But I suppose there are more important things to think about for now.

]]> http://washingtonbriefs.com/2010/07/16/petition-to-watch-or-maybe-not/#comment-196 Sat, 07 Aug 2010 00:36:08 +0000 http://washingtonbriefs.com/?p=487#comment-196 So weird. Just for arguments’ sake, if the government/military WAS controlling her mind, would they honestly want anyone else to know about it?

]]>